Non-Conformance (NCR)
Track every defective lot from detection through root cause analysis, disposition decision, corrective actions, and formal closure.
Overview
A Non-Conformance Report (NCR) is created whenever a lot fails to meet quality requirements — whether from a rejected Quality Checklist, a warehouse receiving discrepancy, a manufacturing defect found by an operator, or a customer complaint. The NCR system enforces a structured six-stage workflow that ensures every defective lot is analysed, dispositioned, and corrected before it is closed.
Six-Stage Workflow
Open → Assigned → Analysis → Disposition → Approved → Closed. The "Advance" button moves an NCR to its next stage. Only a quality manager can close.
Root Cause (6M)
Categorise the root cause using the standard 6M framework: Material, Machine, Method, Man, Measurement, or Environment. Add a free-text description.
Disposition Decision
Choose how the affected lot is handled: Scrap, Rework, Repair, Use As-Is, or Return to Supplier. Each decision carries different downstream implications.
CAPA Action Items
Add corrective and preventive action items directly on the NCR, each with a description, assigned-to person, due date, and status (Pending / In Progress / Completed).
NCR Lifecycle
| Stage | Badge | Responsible | Key Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open | Open | Inspector / System | NCR created; affected lot is identified |
| Assigned | Assigned | Quality Engineer | NCR assigned to an engineer for investigation |
| Analysis | Analysis | Quality Engineer | Root cause category and description recorded on Root Cause tab |
| Disposition | Disposition | Quality Engineer | Lot disposition selected (Scrap / Rework / etc.) on Disposition tab |
| Approved | Approved | Quality Manager | Disposition is formally approved; CAPA items may be in progress |
| Closed | Closed | Quality Manager | All CAPA items verified complete; NCR closed with timestamp |
Creating an NCR
NCRs can be created manually or originate from a rejected checklist.
Manual Creation
- Open Quality Operations → Non-Conformance.
- Click Create NCR. A modal appears.
- Enter the Product Name, Lot Number, Severity, and Qty Affected.
- Write a clear Defect Description — be specific about what failed and where it was detected.
- Optionally enter the Assigned To name — the quality engineer or team member responsible for investigating and closing the NCR. This field is displayed in the NCR's Info tab and is visible to all team members.
- Click Save. The NCR receives an auto-generated number (e.g.
NCR-2025-007) and opens at the Open stage. The Created By field is automatically populated with the logged-in user's identity — no manual entry required.
From a Rejected Checklist
When a Quality Checklist is submitted and the decision is Reject, create the NCR from the Non-Conformance screen referencing the checklist lot number and linking the source to Quality Checklist. The product and lot data can be copied directly from the checklist record.
Defect Description Quality
A good defect description answers: What is wrong, where on the part, how many pieces, and how it was detected. Example: "Thickness 9.2 mm on 12 of 80 sampled pieces (min spec 10.0 mm) — detected by final inspection micrometer check."
Severity Levels
| Severity | Meaning | Typical Response Time |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | Safety or regulatory risk — immediate containment required | Same day |
| Major | Functional defect — customer will notice if shipped | Within 48 hours |
| Minor | Cosmetic or marginal defect — low customer impact | Within 5 business days |
Disposition Options
| Decision | Meaning | Downstream Action |
|---|---|---|
| Scrap | Parts cannot be used or reworked — destroy | Remove quantity from Warehouse stock |
| Rework | Parts can be brought into spec through additional processing | Create a rework Work Order in Manufacturing |
| Repair | Cosmetic fix outside normal routing | Manual repair job; re-inspect after |
| Use As-Is | Non-conformance is acceptable for this use case — requires manager approval | Document concession; release to next operation |
| Return to Supplier | Incoming material fails supplier specification | Raise a purchase return in the Procurement module |
Root Cause Analysis — 6M Categories
The Root Cause tab offers six Ishikawa (fishbone) categories. Select the one that best fits the identified root cause, then write a detailed description:
| Category | Examples |
|---|---|
| Material | Substandard raw material, wrong grade, supplier lot variation |
| Machine | Tool wear, calibration drift, fixture misalignment, spindle runout |
| Method | Incorrect work instruction revision, skipped process step, wrong feed rate |
| Man | Operator error, insufficient training, shift handover communication failure |
| Measurement | Gauge out of calibration, wrong measurement technique, data entry error |
| Environment | Temperature/humidity outside spec, contamination, vibration from adjacent equipment |
CAPA — Corrective & Preventive Actions
The CAPA tab lists action items assigned to individuals to prevent recurrence. Each item has:
- Description — what needs to be done.
- Assigned To — person responsible.
- Due Date — deadline for completion.
- Status — Pending / In Progress / Completed.
Click Add Action to append a new item. Changes are auto-saved after each field edit. All CAPA items should reach Completed status before the NCR is closed.
CAPA vs. Root Cause
Root cause explains why the defect happened. CAPA is the plan to prevent it from happening again. Both are required for a meaningful NCR — an NCR without CAPA actions is unlikely to drive lasting improvement.
History Tab — Audit Timeline
Every NCR includes a History tab that displays a reverse-chronological timeline of all key events:
- Created — when the NCR was first opened and by whom
- Root Cause Saved — when root cause analysis was completed
- Disposition Approved — when the quality decision was approved
- Closed — when the NCR was formally resolved
Events are sorted newest-first. The timeline provides a complete audit trail for regulatory compliance, customer audits, and internal quality reviews.
AI Assistant
Non-Conformance includes a right-edge AI Assistant panel that reviews your current NCR list — number, product, lot, severity, status, quantity affected, source, assignee, and whether root cause / disposition / CAPA are recorded — and answers natural-language questions about it.
Aging & Bottleneck Review
Flags NCRs stuck in one status for a long time, or open critical/major NCRs with no assignee.
Root-Cause Gaps
Flags NCRs past the analysis stage that still have no root cause recorded.
CAPA Follow-Through
Flags NCRs with open CAPA actions and no completed ones, or a disposition set with zero CAPAs defined.
Severity & Source Trends
Summarizes which products, lots, or sources are generating the most critical/major NCRs.
Save Assistant Answers as Reports
Any assistant response can be saved directly to My Reports with one click, so an aging review or CAPA follow-up summary doesn't have to be re-generated later.
Frequently Asked Questions
NCR-YYYY-NNN. This ensures numbers are always unique and in sequence, regardless of how many NCRs are created concurrently.